I don't think it's clear WHY people voted for option C - was it the sets? no upgrades? the level? no exping? the team size? the fort size? Has there been a survey asking any (preferably ALL) of this I'm unaware of? I don't think so. We had ONE survey before the practice event, asking us, in my opinion, a question of second-class importance.
That is true, but I think I vote for a whole option, not just the details I like.
I can only speculate you played the event world this idea came from.
That is not right. I just got active again for this IFBC
can we not let other people have their opinions?
We can, but also I can have a pretty firm opinion and express that.
It's a practice server for a reason - if enough people - people with DIVERSE backgrounds, experiences, etc. - agree on wanting something added or subtracted, shouldn't we listen?
In my opinion: Yes and No. Why that?
I really liked the idea of giving the players the chance to design this event. What I don't like is the amount of feedback rounds and posibilities to maybe change something. And there is a reason for me not to do so: In my opinion, when you announce a format of this size and needed preperation, the rules should no change at all in the main details which are here the bonuses, as they clearly dictate, what you can and can't do with level 150, the clothing, the level, the battle size and also the structure of the championship, of course.
Yes I am really really firm with my opinion, but I am only here to express this opinion to have a counterpart of this changing ideas. That opinion is also important to be presentated. I accept, that it is not in my hands, how this turnament will be from 15th of april as at IFBC3, but I try to express my sight on the things on every detail posted here. And I really think that is as important as you or other players expressing their change requests.
thank you for your very detailed "confrontation". i think something like what you wrote above is very important. See you on the battlefield, whatever happens