• Attention!
    • In order to participate in the discussion, you need an account on forum.events.the-west.net.​
      • If you have a game account, register a forum account here: Create forum account
        Important: You cannot comment with your account from your home server (e.g. you cannot vote with an account from the German servers)! You have to have a separate registration on our Events Server!​
      • If you don't have a game account register here or send us an e-mail and we will create a game account for you: west-ts@support.innogames.com
        Please send us your desired nickname! Your account will be linked to the e-mail address from which you contact us! Please expect at least 48 hours for the account creation.​

IFBC 3 - discussion

DeletedUser85

Guest
Why troll? People need to be happy that they want to help them. In the covid-19 period we need to help each other and not fight with each other. We can fight together and kill the covid-19!
 

Deleted User - 5772

Guest
I think it should be made more clear to the players what sort of consequences will exist for those found to be signing in to other team's battles intentionally so that it doesn't become a more common occurrence - something like a few days ban for the first offense and so on.

Leaders can traitor such players, but that doesn't stop them from seeing the line up of attackers and potentially passing the information on. There's also the distinct possibility of some players signing in for other team's battles at the very last minute, so that there's no time to traitor them, and they can view the battle chat and orders - then potentially passing them on to friends on the other side. This issue has to be taken very seriously and resolved at the earliest.
 

DeletedUser153

Guest
I think it should be made more clear to the players what sort of consequences will exist for those found to be signing in to other team's battles intentionally so that it doesn't become a more common occurrence - something like a few days ban for the first offense and so on.

Leaders can traitor such players, but that doesn't stop them from seeing the line up of attackers and potentially passing the information on. There's also the distinct possibility of some players signing in for other team's battles at the very last minute, so that there's no time to traitor them, and they can view the battle chat and orders - then potentially passing them on to friends on the other side. This issue has to be taken very seriously and resolved at the earliest.
Thanks for your input.
We will add section about this in our rules.
 

Deleted User - 6799

Guest
Is it not possible to add restrictions for which towns can sign up?

Also this isn't the 1st IFBC, how to miss such a crucial thing..
 

DeletedUser17

Guest
Thanks for your input.
We will add section about this in our rules.

When you dig the fort battles, can't you add requirements that only towns A and/or B can join attack and town C can join defense? or do that based on alliance in case of mixed teams. That was also done last edition and works better then simply punishing anyone who singes up to the wrong battle (by mistake).
 

DeletedUser153

Guest
When you dig the fort battles, can't you add requirements that only towns A and/or B can join attack and town C can join defense? or do that based on alliance in case of mixed teams. That was also done last edition and works better then simply punishing anyone who singes up to the wrong battle (by mistake).
As you were writing this we already applied such restrictions to the already initiated battles and such restrictions will also be put on future battles.
But the rule will stay to prevent players from joining the battles if we somehow miss to add the restrictions or if they are not working correctly.

To sum up: From now on it should only be possible to join fortfights for the attacking and defending town/alliance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Deleted User - 6799

Guest
I wrote it before him (last night and today) thank you very much.

So, is server bonus (at least Speed) gonna be renewed or naa?
 

DeletedUser50

Guest
How is it possible to have players in the fort battle chat without being registered?
We can't even give a traitor for not being registered.
 

Deleted User - 4781

Guest
Yep, they f****d it too, removed people from displaying battle but they are still in the chat and can see tactics xD

2FF77Br.png


Btw. How to become Watcher? Person who wants to watch Championship must fill some ticket in support?
 

DeletedUser153

Guest
2FF77Br.png


Btw. How to become Watcher? Person who wants to watch Championship must fill some ticket in support?
Watcher is who is out of the championship. So basically after qualification stage we will have 7 Teams as watchers.
 

Old Mustaros Kez

Unassigned
  • from now on, in addition to the precise single shot rifle, each team can also receive rusty rifles in their Gunsmith. But this will be the only quest item we will add to your townshops as it is necessary for the Legendary Golden Gun.

When? :)
 

DeletedUser1089

Guest
  • from now on, in addition to the precise single shot rifle, each team can also receive rusty rifles in their Gunsmith. But this will be the only quest item we will add to your townshops as it is necessary for the Legendary Golden Gun.

When? :)
When you send ticket to support :p
 

DeletedUser1107

Guest
What does it mean to be permanently banned because I complain about racist discourse?

Is racist discourse not a reason for punishment? I am insulted here, but I am the punishment again. will someone explain?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top